ArticleBMC public health2026
Longitudinal associations of traditional and cyberbullying victimization with perceived stress in adolescents: findings from the STARS cohort.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathways From Cyber Victimization to Adolescent Depression: A Latent Profile and Bridge Network Analysis.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerceived stress in adolescence is a known early marker for later mental health problems, including depression. Yet, its links to traditional and cyberbullying remain understudied, especially in longitudinal research. Gender differences in stress may reflect varying bullying experiences, but this connection is still unclear. This longitudinal study investigated whether victimization by traditional bullying and/or cyberbullying between ages 13 and 15 is associated with increased self-perceived stress, and whether these associations differ by sex or the form of victimization.
methodsWe used data from the baseline (age 13) and two-year follow-up (age 15) surveys of the STARS (Study of Resilience and Stress) cohort in Sweden. The sample included 2099 adolescents (44% male and 56% female). Perceived stress was measured by Cohen’s Perceived Stress Scale, while traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization were each assessed using a single-item question. Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-square tests, one-way ANOVAs, and General Linear Models for repeated measures adjusting for confounders in the whole sample, and sex-stratified analyses.
resultsPerceived stress increased between ages 13 and 15 for both sexes, with females consistently reporting higher stress levels than males. The prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization rates ranged from 8.2–11.2% and 7.1–9.9%, respectively, and generally declined over the two years. Females were more exposed to cyberbullying victimization at both time points (8.3–9.9%) compared to males (5.3–5.5%). In both sexes, experiencing bullying–whether traditional, cyber, or both–at the age 13, 15 or at both time points was associated with increased stress levels over the two years. The impact on stress persisted even without continued victimization. Although overall patterns were similar between males and females, being cyberbullied at age 15 was specifically associated with increased stress among females, but not males. Changes in stress levels were similar across both forms of victimization.
conclusionsExposure to traditional and/or cyberbullying at age 13, 15, or across both time points is associated with increased perceived stress over time in both males and females, highlighting the potentially lasting impact of victimization on adolescent stress trajectories and the importance of preventive and supportive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.