ArticleBMC public health2026
Stratifying areas at risk of housing insecurity among families with children: a multidimensional index for the improvement of policy interventions in England.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHousing insecurity resulting from multiple, involuntary residential moves is detrimental to the health and wellbeing of families with children. Policy makers seeking to mitigate these negative effects require a measure of risk of housing insecurity. Here we present the development of a novel risk index for England.
methodsWe undertook a literature review to select drivers of housing insecurity and identify relevant metrics. We recruited a practitioner panel to rank and weight these metrics using a Likert survey. The weighted metrics were summed for each small area (Lower Super Output Area) in England to produce the overall risk score. The score was then stratified into five levels, from very low to very high, linked to geographical units for data mapping. The final index (called the “Families at Risk of Housing Insecurity Index”) was made available on a public data platform.
resultsEight drivers of housing insecurity were identified from the literature review as follows, (variable type and weight shown in brackets): primary school pupils eligible for free school meals (%, 0.5); income deprivation affecting children (%, 0.5); residential mobility (decile, 0.4); lone parent households (%, 0.3); pre-1919 dwellings (%, 0.3); households in fuel poverty (%, 0.3); households with dependent children in which the reference person is of Asian or Asian British, Black, Black British, or Caribbean ethnicity (%, 0.2); mental health (Small Area Mental Health Index; decile, 0.1). Analysis of the index indicated a highly varied distribution of risk across England. Two noteworthy findings were the greater proportion of very high risk areas in Greater London, possibly indicating the impact of higher living costs in the capital city region. The index also suggested there were areas at higher risk in generally more affluent settings, possibly due to a greater proportion of older housing stock in these locations.
conclusionThe Families at Risk of Housing Insecurity Index (FRoHII) was composed of metrics from public datasets at the small area level. The index provides a public resource to help identify areas where families with children might be at risk of housing insecurity. The index constitutes a tool and resource for professionals seeking to provide support to families within their catchment areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.