Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612244›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Stratifying areas at risk of housing insecurity among families with children: a multidimensional index for the improvement of policy interventions in England.

Jamie O'Brien, Emma Coombes, Anne-Marie Burn, Hannah Fairbrother, Eleanor Holding, Nicholas Woodrow, Sarah E Rodgers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamie O'BrienInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block B, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK. jamie75@liverpool.ac.uk.
Emma CoombesInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block B, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK.
Anne-Marie BurnDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Hannah FairbrotherSchool of Allied Health Professions, Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, 362 Mushroom Lane, Sheffield, S10 2TS, UK.
Eleanor HoldingSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, G033a Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Nicholas WoodrowSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (ScHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, G033a Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Sarah E RodgersInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block B, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK.

Funding

Health and Care Research (NIHR) / School for Public Health Research (SPHR) NIHR 204000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousing insecurity resulting from multiple, involuntary residential moves is detrimental to the health and wellbeing of families with children. Policy makers seeking to mitigate these negative effects require a measure of risk of housing insecurity. Here we present the development of a novel risk index for England.

methodsWe undertook a literature review to select drivers of housing insecurity and identify relevant metrics. We recruited a practitioner panel to rank and weight these metrics using a Likert survey. The weighted metrics were summed for each small area (Lower Super Output Area) in England to produce the overall risk score. The score was then stratified into five levels, from very low to very high, linked to geographical units for data mapping. The final index (called the “Families at Risk of Housing Insecurity Index”) was made available on a public data platform.

resultsEight drivers of housing insecurity were identified from the literature review as follows, (variable type and weight shown in brackets): primary school pupils eligible for free school meals (%, 0.5); income deprivation affecting children (%, 0.5); residential mobility (decile, 0.4); lone parent households (%, 0.3); pre-1919 dwellings (%, 0.3); households in fuel poverty (%, 0.3); households with dependent children in which the reference person is of Asian or Asian British, Black, Black British, or Caribbean ethnicity (%, 0.2); mental health (Small Area Mental Health Index; decile, 0.1). Analysis of the index indicated a highly varied distribution of risk across England. Two noteworthy findings were the greater proportion of very high risk areas in Greater London, possibly indicating the impact of higher living costs in the capital city region. The index also suggested there were areas at higher risk in generally more affluent settings, possibly due to a greater proportion of older housing stock in these locations.

conclusionThe Families at Risk of Housing Insecurity Index (FRoHII) was composed of metrics from public datasets at the small area level. The index provides a public resource to help identify areas where families with children might be at risk of housing insecurity. The index constitutes a tool and resource for professionals seeking to provide support to families within their catchment areas.

Indexed as

HousingHousing InstabilityChildEnglandHumansRisk AssessmentChildren and young peopleFamily health and wellbeingHomelessnessHousing insecurityMultidimensional risk indexPublic data

Identifiers

PMID41612244
PMCPMC13045134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.