ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Development of imaging protocol and radiomics-based nomogram for assessing lesion reversibility in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessing the reversibility of connective tissue disease associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) is critical for treatment decision-making, yet standardized imaging criteria and baseline predictive tools remain limited. We aimed to establish a CT-based protocol to determine lesion reversibility and develop a combined radiomics–morphology nomogram to predict baseline reversibility.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed consecutive CTD-ILD patients (January 2016–June 2022, diagnosed via ACR/EULAR criteria) from three branches of Renji Hospital. CTD-ILD diagnoses were established by a multidisciplinary team of respiratory physicians and thoracic radiologists based on clinical manifestations and chest CT imaging. Patients from the South Branch were randomly split into training and internal validation cohorts (7:3), while patients from the East and West Branches formed an independent external validation cohort. Lesion reversibility was adjudicated using longitudinal CT series across six lung zones: the scan with the greatest lesion extent was defined as baseline (CT0); completely reversible (CR) lesions were defined as complete absorption of baseline lesions on any follow-up CT, whereas non-CR required persistence of baseline lesions on both 3–6-month (CTF1) and 12-month (CTF2) follow-up CTs. Zonal-level radiomics signatures and visual CT features were used to develop radiomics, visual, and combined nomogram models.
resultsThe final cohort included 153 patients (median age, 53 years; interquartile range, 44–62 years), with 40 males (26.1%) and 113 females (73.9%) with 575 affected lung zones. Cohorts comprised 66/28/59 patients (training/internal validation/external validation). The radiomics model showed moderate discrimination (areas under the curve [AUCs] 0.72/0.77/0.73), while the visual model performed similarly or better (AUCs 0.82/0.87/0.78). The combined nomogram achieved the best overall performance (AUCs 0.86/0.90/0.82), with significant improvement over the visual model in the training and external validation cohorts.
conclusionWe established a longitudinal imaging protocol to standardize reversibility assessment and validated a combined nomogram that integrates quantitative and visual data. This tool accurately predicts lesion reversibility at baseline, potentially facilitating personalized treatment strategies for CTD-ILD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.