ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Caregiver-reported good practices and their associations with care-recipient condition in dementia care: a text-mining study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDementia care requires specific “good practice” actions, which often involve tacit knowledge possessed by experienced caregivers. This study extracts and verifies caregiver-reported good practice actions that improve the condition of people with dementia and compiles them into a structured list.
methodsAn online survey was conducted on Japanese care and medical professionals (nurses, care workers, therapists, and care managers). Participants answered questions on basic attributes, dementia attitude scales, dementia knowledge scales, and the Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) and provided free-text descriptions of good practice in six care situations: eating, mobility/transfer, hygiene, toileting, bathing/dressing, and communication Free-response comments were analyzed using KH Coder, as follows: (1) cooccurrence network analysis was performed to identify clusters of related terms, and (2) participants were divided into two groups based on the median ADQ score and distinctive terms were extracted from the high ADQ score group. Subsequently, a list of items serving as good practice was compiled, and the item list was validated using the Delphi method. A panel of 16 experts evaluated the appropriateness of each good practice item using a content validity ratio (CVR).
resultsA total of 724 valid responses were analyzed (from 897 respondents; 173 were excluded). Frequent term analysis using KH Coder identified keywords such as “voice,” “explanation,” “eye contact,” “pace,” and “confirmation.” Further, co-occurring clusters included “explanation” and “menu” with respect to eating and “confirmation” and “temperature” for bathing/dressing. Correspondence analysis highlighted terms such as “understanding,” “preference,” “safety,” and “consent,” enabling the derivation of good practice items such as “explain the content of meals,” “match the pace,” “make eye contact,” and “check the water temperature.” Among 79 items, 72 satisfied the CVR threshold.
conclusionsBy combining text mining and expert consensus, we created 72 validated good practice items representing tacit caregiver knowledge. These items, which are believed to reflect the principles of person-centered care, are expected to be useful in training programs on nonpharmacological interventions for caregivers of people with dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.