Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612196›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Caregiver-reported good practices and their associations with care-recipient condition in dementia care: a text-mining study.

Hiroyuki Tanaka, Masahiro Tenjin, Haruka Atosako, Yuma Nagata, Daiki Ishimaru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hiroyuki TanakaOsaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, 2-1-132, Morinomiya, Joto-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 536-8525, Japan. hytanaka@omu.ac.jp.
Masahiro TenjinGraduate Student, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, 2-1-132, Morinomiya, Joto-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 536-8525, Japan.
Haruka AtosakoGraduate Student, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, 2-1-132, Morinomiya, Joto-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 536-8525, Japan.
Yuma NagataOsaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, 2-1-132, Morinomiya, Joto-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 536-8525, Japan.
Daiki IshimaruOsaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, 2-1-132, Morinomiya, Joto-Ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 536-8525, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 23K10265Research Foundation for Dementia Osaka 2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia care requires specific “good practice” actions, which often involve tacit knowledge possessed by experienced caregivers. This study extracts and verifies caregiver-reported good practice actions that improve the condition of people with dementia and compiles them into a structured list.

methodsAn online survey was conducted on Japanese care and medical professionals (nurses, care workers, therapists, and care managers). Participants answered questions on basic attributes, dementia attitude scales, dementia knowledge scales, and the Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) and provided free-text descriptions of good practice in six care situations: eating, mobility/transfer, hygiene, toileting, bathing/dressing, and communication Free-response comments were analyzed using KH Coder, as follows: (1) cooccurrence network analysis was performed to identify clusters of related terms, and (2) participants were divided into two groups based on the median ADQ score and distinctive terms were extracted from the high ADQ score group. Subsequently, a list of items serving as good practice was compiled, and the item list was validated using the Delphi method. A panel of 16 experts evaluated the appropriateness of each good practice item using a content validity ratio (CVR).

resultsA total of 724 valid responses were analyzed (from 897 respondents; 173 were excluded). Frequent term analysis using KH Coder identified keywords such as “voice,” “explanation,” “eye contact,” “pace,” and “confirmation.” Further, co-occurring clusters included “explanation” and “menu” with respect to eating and “confirmation” and “temperature” for bathing/dressing. Correspondence analysis highlighted terms such as “understanding,” “preference,” “safety,” and “consent,” enabling the derivation of good practice items such as “explain the content of meals,” “match the pace,” “make eye contact,” and “check the water temperature.” Among 79 items, 72 satisfied the CVR threshold.

conclusionsBy combining text mining and expert consensus, we created 72 validated good practice items representing tacit caregiver knowledge. These items, which are believed to reflect the principles of person-centered care, are expected to be useful in training programs on nonpharmacological interventions for caregivers of people with dementia.

Indexed as

CaregiversData MiningDementiaFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesDementia careGood practiceNonpharmacological therapyPerson‐centered careText mining

Identifiers

PMID41612196
PMCPMC12930563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.