Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612190›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2026

Independent centromeric expansions define giant hornet genomes.

Andrew Ontano, Sheina B Sim, Jerry Jenkins, Scott M Geib, Anna K Childers, Brian Scheffler, Justin Vaughn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew OntanoDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. andrew.ontano@uga.edu.
Sheina B SimAgricultural Research Service, Tropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit, USDA, Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, 64 Nowelo Street, Hilo, HI, 96720, USA.
Jerry JenkinsHudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA.
Scott M GeibAgricultural Research Service, Tropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit, USDA, Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, 64 Nowelo Street, Hilo, HI, 96720, USA.
Anna K ChildersAgricultural Research Service, Bee Research Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, USDA, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Brian SchefflerJamie Whitten Delta States Research Center, Genetics and Bioinformatics Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, 141 Experiment Station Rd, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA.
Justin VaughnDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 6066-21310-006-000-DAgricultural Research Service 8042-30500-002-000-DAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service 8042-21000-291-046-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Vespa lineage of hornets demonstrate the potential to displace native species and cause significant damage to US apiculture through predation. In spite of introductions in recent years to North America, eradication efforts have prevented the Northern Giant Hornet, Vespa mandarinia, from establishing. Improved genomic resources could offer insight into the traits that define this lineage: large body size variance, adaptability to new environments, and high potential for invasiveness.

resultsWe sequenced and assembled genomes of two lineages of the northern giant hornet, Vespa mandarinia, and one of the European hornet, Vespa crabro, using HiFi long read sequencing technology. We found centromeric and pericentric satellite repeats account for nearly half the total DNA of the hornet genomes and their identities were largely unique across species, indicating active, independent expansion. The intraspecific northern giant hornet genomes exhibit asymmetrical expansion across homologous chromosomal regions localized with Hi-C scaffolding. We leveraged pangenomic alignments of the hornet genomes to identify derived mutations, particularly those that affect repeat content and transposable elements (TEs). We found that TEs do not contribute to the bulk repeat content and show no differential expansion in genic space.

conclusionsLarge tandemly repetitive DNA account for large structural variations across the Vespa and between V. mandarinia. Localization within the genomes necessitated a suite of tools to support the assembly and identification of those elements. Typical repercussions of long-term reductions in population size – namely, reduced diversity and TE expansion – are not present. The degree to which alternative explanations, such as cell and body size selection or centromeric drive, cause massive, localized repeat amplification will require more extensive sampling.

Indexed as

CentromereGenomeGenomicsWaspsAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularDNA Transposable ElementsCentromereEvolutionInvasive speciesPangenomeRepeat expansionRepetitive elements

Identifiers

PMID41612190
PMCPMC12922439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.