ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Prediction of oil yield in sunflower using deep learning regression algorithm under normal and drought stress conditions.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of sunflower oil yield is essential for crop management and breeding decisions, particularly under water-limited environments. In this study, 100 pure oilseed sunflower lines were evaluated under normal and drought stress conditions across two consecutive growing seasons (2014–2016), and all morphological and physiological variables were measured directly in the field. Input variables were selected based on their previously demonstrated influence on grain yield and oil-related traits, while the complete two-year dataset was used for model training, validation, and testing following data augmentation, standardization, and 7-fold cross-validation. The predictive performance of multiple linear regression (MLR) and deep learning regression (DLR) models was compared using different combinations of input variables. The DLR model consistently demonstrated superior performance, achieving higher accuracy and lower prediction errors across all scenarios. The best results were obtained under drought stress with 11 input variables, where the DLR model achieved (R2 = 0.98, RMSE = 0.4, MSE = 0.16, MAE = 0.20 (train), R2 = 0.96, RMSE = 0.55, MSE = 0.31, MAE = 0.34 (test)), along with markedly lower RMSE and MAE values than MLR. Even when fewer variables were used, the DLR model maintained strong predictive ability, highlighting its capacity to learn complex nonlinear relationships and generalize from limited data. Overall, the findings underscore the potential of DLR as a robust predictive tool for estimating oil yield under contrasting environmental conditions and provide practical implications for genotype selection, harvest planning, and sunflower breeding strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.