ArticleJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2026
Hemispheric transfer and dyslexia: testing the deficit hypothesis for word and symmetry recognition using visual half-field tasks.
Article in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe interhemispheric transfer deficit theory proposes that individuals with dyslexia have impaired interhemispheric transfer, particularly affecting the integration of visual information from the left and right visual fields. This study aimed to evaluate this hypothesis by examining interhemispheric transfer in dyslexia using visual half-field tasks targeting both linguistic and visuospatial processing.
methodsWe examined interhemispheric transfer in dyslexia using two visual half-field tasks: a lexical decision task to assess written word processing, and a symmetry decision task to examine visuospatial processing. We compared reaction times and accuracy in 90 Dutch-speaking participants (45 with dyslexia, 45 controls) across left, right, and bilateral stimulus presentations.
resultsWhile both tasks successfully captured expected visual half-field differences in the control group, favoring the right visual field in the lexical decision task and the left visual field in the symmetry detection task, we did not observe that the dyslexia group showed increased differences between the two fields, as predicted by the interhemispheric transfer deficit theory. Furthermore, the dyslexia group benefited just as much as controls from stimuli presented simultaneously to both visual fields. Thus, no evidence of interhemispheric transfer deficits related to dyslexia was found in either task.
conclusionsThese findings challenge the broad applicability of the interhemispheric transfer deficit theory in dyslexia, suggesting that such impairments may be task-dependent rather than domain-general. Future studies should further explore the conditions under which interhemispheric transfer deficits might occur in dyslexia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.