ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Perspectives of Black and White Family Members on Medical Decision Making for ICU Patients.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health System Policies Following State Abortion Restrictions in the US.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn intensive care units (ICUs), shared decision making (SDM) between clinicians and families is critical for evaluating complex tradeoffs of life-sustaining treatments and making patient-centered decisions, yet clinicians are less likely to engage in SDM with Black compared to White families.
objectiveTo describe how Black compared to White family members experienced medical decision making about life-sustaining treatments for their critically ill loved ones.
designThis study is a thematic analysis of semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews with primary surrogate decision makers. The codebook included recommended components of SDM and known mechanisms of communication disparities. Analysts were blinded to family member race during coding; then patterns between and within racial groups were analyzed to identify themes.
participantsBlack or White primary surrogate decision makers for patients mechanically ventilated for ≥ 48 h. MAIN MEASURES: Themes describing experiences of medical decision making. KEY
resultsIn 43 interviews, both Black (n = 25, 58%) and White (n = 18, 42%) family members were middle aged (median [interquartile range, IQR]: 55 [15] years vs 58 [17] years) and had critically ill loved ones with similar lengths of ICU stay (median [IQR]: 18 [22] days vs 23 [18] days). Black family members disproportionately reported the following: (1) experiencing pressure to make decisions that aligned with the ICU team's recommendations and timeline, (2) needing to code-switch by modifying their communication and behavior to ensure their advocacy was welcomed rather than perceived as intrusive, (3) being disregarded by the medical team, which negatively impacted partnership towards shared decisions, and (4) trusting clinicians' competence but not necessarily their intentions for critically ill loved ones.
conclusionsCompared to White family members, Black family members of critically ill patients experienced unique challenges relevant to SDM. These results may identify promising focus areas for future conceptual models and interventions to improve equity in ICU-based SDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.