ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Implementation of Core Entrustable Professional Activities in the Internal Medicine Clerkship: A Psychometric Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Education Research: Development of a Workplace-Based Assessment to Enhance EEG Interpretation Skills for Medical Students.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
- Development and Clinical Validation of an Entrustable Professional Activities Framework for Respiratory Nurses: A Longitudinal Workplace-Based Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEntrustable professional activities (EPAs) have been proposed as a holistic approach to competency-based assessment. The 13 Core EPAs for Entering Residency (CEPAER) are essential tasks that a medical student should be trusted to perform with indirect supervision upon entering residency, based on demonstrated competence.
objectiveTo study the validity and reliability of workplace-based assessments of the 13 core EPAs as measurements of medical student performance and growth over the Internal Medicine (IM) clerkship.
designCorrelational-based population study.
participantsA total of 398 third-year medical students at the University of Minnesota Medical School participated. Students were enrolled in a required 8-week IM clerkship during the 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 academic years. A total of 825 assessors provided EPA ratings with a mean number of 12 per assessor; SD = 15.08. MAIN MEASURES: There were 10,034 EPA-based assessments collected (mean per student = 25; SD = 6.1). The most frequently assessed EPAs were EPA 6 (Provide an oral presentation of a clinical encounter; n = 1866; mean per student = 4.69), EPA 5 (Document a clinical encounter in the patient record; n = 1662; mean per student = 4.18), and EPA 2 (Recommend and interpret common diagnostic and screening tests; n = 1421; mean per student = 3.57). KEY
resultsRegression analyses indicated statistically significant growth in entrustment scores for EPAs 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Generalizability analysis showed that to achieve adequate reliability (Ep2 ≥ 0.80), at least 5 assessments were required to be conducted by 5 raters.
conclusionEPAs represent a valid and reliable measure for medical student growth during the IM clerkship, particularly for EPAs 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 10.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.