ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Benchmark White Matter Hyperintensity Segmentation Methods Fail on Heterogeneous Clinical MRI: A New Dataset and Deep Learning-Based Solutions.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for white matter hyperintensity segmentation: performance, determinants, and clinical implications.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing automated methods for white matter hyperintensity (WMH) segmentation often generalize poorly to heterogeneous clinical MRI due to variability in scanner types, field strengths, and protocols. To address this challenge, we introduce a diverse clinical WMH dataset and evaluate two deep learning-based solutions: an nnU-Net model trained directly on the data and a foundation model adapted through fine-tuning. This retrospective study included 195 routine brain MRI scans acquired from 71 scanners between June 2006 and October 2022. Participants ranged in age from 46 to 87 years (median, 70 years; 94 females). WMHs were manually annotated by an experienced rater and reviewed under neuroradiologist supervision. Several benchmark segmentation methods were evaluated against these annotations. We then developed Robust-WMH-UNet by training nnU-Net on the dataset and Robust-WMH-SAM by fine-tuning MedSAM, a vision foundation model. Benchmark methods demonstrated poor generalization, frequently missing small lesions and producing false positives in anatomically complex regions such as the septum pellucidum. Robust-WMH-UNet achieved superior accuracy (median Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], 0.768) with improved specificity, while Robust-WMH-SAM attained competitive performance (median DSC up to 0.750) after only limited training, reaching acceptable accuracy within a single epoch. This new clinically representative dataset provides a strong foundation for developing robust WMH algorithms, enabling fair cross-method comparisons, and supporting the translation of segmentation models into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41612110What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.