Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612110›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Benchmark White Matter Hyperintensity Segmentation Methods Fail on Heterogeneous Clinical MRI: A New Dataset and Deep Learning-Based Solutions.

Junjie Wu, Joshua D Brown, Ranliang Hu, Paula J Edwards, Allan I Levey, James J Lah, Deqiang Qiu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junjie WuDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. jwu40@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-2352
Joshua D BrownDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Ranliang HuDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Paula J EdwardsDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Allan I LeveyDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
James J LahDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Deqiang QiuDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. dqiu3@emory.edu.

Funding

The Emory Healthy Brain Study: Discovering Predictive Biomarkers for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG070937 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LAH, JAMES J · 2021 to 2025
$35.2M
The Goizueta Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066511 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Amy D Rodriguez · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Cerebral hemodynamic impairment in symptomatic and asymptomatic Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG072603 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Deqiang Qiu · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
Using AI on Routine Clinical and Imaging Data from Acute Stroke Encounter to Predict Post-Stroke Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment (AI - RESPECT)RF1NS139325 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HU, XIAO, NAHAB, FADI BASIL · 2024 to 2025
$2.6M
Explainable and Ethical AI for Studying Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG089806 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JAMES J LAH, Deqiang Qiu · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30AG066511NIA NIH HHS R01AG070937NIA NIH HHS R01AG072603NIA NIH HHS R01AG089806NINDS NIH HHS RF1NS139325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing automated methods for white matter hyperintensity (WMH) segmentation often generalize poorly to heterogeneous clinical MRI due to variability in scanner types, field strengths, and protocols. To address this challenge, we introduce a diverse clinical WMH dataset and evaluate two deep learning-based solutions: an nnU-Net model trained directly on the data and a foundation model adapted through fine-tuning. This retrospective study included 195 routine brain MRI scans acquired from 71 scanners between June 2006 and October 2022. Participants ranged in age from 46 to 87 years (median, 70 years; 94 females). WMHs were manually annotated by an experienced rater and reviewed under neuroradiologist supervision. Several benchmark segmentation methods were evaluated against these annotations. We then developed Robust-WMH-UNet by training nnU-Net on the dataset and Robust-WMH-SAM by fine-tuning MedSAM, a vision foundation model. Benchmark methods demonstrated poor generalization, frequently missing small lesions and producing false positives in anatomically complex regions such as the septum pellucidum. Robust-WMH-UNet achieved superior accuracy (median Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], 0.768) with improved specificity, while Robust-WMH-SAM attained competitive performance (median DSC up to 0.750) after only limited training, reaching acceptable accuracy within a single epoch. This new clinically representative dataset provides a strong foundation for developing robust WMH algorithms, enabling fair cross-method comparisons, and supporting the translation of segmentation models into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Clinical MRIDeep learning segmentationFoundation modelsnnU-NetWhite matter hyperintensities

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.