SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Cerebral cavernous malformations in pregnancy: A systematic review of case reports and case series of hemorrhagic risk and outcomes.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cavernous malformations (CMs) are vascular lesions that can lead to seizures or hemorrhage. Although pregnancy involves hormonal and circulatory changes that might influence CM behavior, whether it increases the risk of bleeding is unclear. We performed a systematic review using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus of published reports describing pregnant women diagnosed with cerebral or spinal CMs. The study question was framed using the PEO strategy, with pregnant women with cavernous angioma as the population, hemorrhage as the exposure, and clinical outcomes as the endpoints. The search was updated to July 12th, 2025 with no time restrictions. This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Thirty-two studies were selected accounting for 94 patients. Most lesions were localized in the brainstem and supratentorial regions. Among patients that were symptomatic during gestation, hemorrhage occurred in 70.9% and seizures in 34.1%. However, a secondary analysis limited to comparative studies consistently showed a low hemorrhage rate during pregnancy, ranging from 0.9% to 3%. Most patients were managed conservatively. Surgical intervention was reserved for cases with acute neurological deterioration or persistent hemorrhage, located below the tentorium. Although, more on prudence than evidence, cesarean delivery was frequently chosen. The secondary analysis on the larger cohorts confirms that pregnancy does not increase the risk of bleeding. Treatment, however, must be postponed after delivery. Nonetheless, in cases where early intervention is unavoidable, due to topography and severity of maternal symptoms, surgery might be an option. Additionally, close monitoring in the early postpartum period remains indispensable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.