ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Health Literacy and Cultural Sensitivity in Spanish Online Breast Reduction Resources.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth literacy is an understudied topic among published Spanish resources. Research focused on resources written in English demonstrates that content exceeds the recommended reading level for patients. Given the prevalence of breast reduction procedures and the increase in diverse patients undergoing the procedure in the last few years, this study explores the readability of Spanish information discussing breast reduction surgery by private and academic organizational websites.
methodsUsing a de-identified Google search engine, we identified the first 20 Spanish websites that provided breast reduction information. Two independent reviewers used the Patient Education and Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool (CSAT) to assess understandability, actionability, and cultural sensitivity of each website. The Spanish SMOG readability formula (SOL), Gilliam-Peña-Mountain, the Fry Readability Adaptation for Spanish Evaluation (FRASE), and Crawford assessments were used to assess readability.
resultsBoth private- and academic-based websites scored above 70% for understandability but had lower scores for actionability. CSAT scores were just marginally above the threshold. Both private and academic readability assessments revealed consistently high reading grade levels 2 ranging from ninth to eleventh grade, except Crawford scores, which assessed a mean reading level of 6th grade.
conclusionWebsites displaying Spanish content exceed the recommended level for patient educational materials. While the average understandability scores may be satisfactory on some websites, many have room for improvement, specifically regarding actionability. A limited sample size also emphasized the need to advocate for institutions to cater to patients who speak languages other than English. Important Points: Online Spanish resources on breast reduction are often too complex and exceed the recommended reading level for patients. Spanish resources need to be more than simple English translation to promote more cultural sensitivity. There is a significant gap in published online Spanish resources on breast reduction, particularly from academic and private organizations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41612066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.