ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Toy exploration in gifted word learner dogs and typical dogs.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Labelling has a pronounced effect on increasing infants' attention to objects. At the same time, infants actively seek social cues when presented with novel objects and early signs of communicative intent are considered essential for language learning. Although no other species has been shown to possess language in its integrity, a small group of rare individual dogs (Gifted Word Learners, GWL) shows a limited subset of language-related skills: the capacity to form an extensive vocabulary of object verbal labels rapidly. Comparing these dogs to typical dogs that lack this capacity provides a unique opportunity to study the relationship between vocabulary acquisition and other cognitive traits in a non-human, non-linguistic species that evolved and developed in the human environment. The present study compares the object preferences and tendency to seek social interactions of GWL (N = 10) and typical (N = 21) dogs. During a two-week familiarisation phase, the caretakers and the dogs engaged in play with four dog toys, only two of which were labelled. In contrast, the other two were not labelled during the playful interaction. The subsequent test phase consisted of two trials in which these four toys, along with two novel ones, were placed on the floor, and the caretakers remained passive. The dogs were given 90 s to explore freely. The results did not provide evidence for significant differences between GWL dogs and T dogs' exploration of the labelled, unlabelled and novel objects. GWL dogs, however, demonstrated a significantly higher propensity to interact with their caretakers while holding a toy in their mouths, notably, mainly presenting the novel toy to their caretakers. GWL dogs' tendency to interact with the passive caretaker may suggest a greater interest in the social aspect of interacting with objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.