ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Management strategies and determinants of clinical decision-making in oroantral communication among dental practitioners.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOroantral communication (OAC) represents an abnormal connection between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus, often arising after posterior maxillary extractions. Unmanaged OACs can lead to chronic sinusitis and fistula formation. Despite various treatment options, standardized guidelines are lacking. This study examined current management strategies, influencing factors, and practitioner confidence in treating OACs among dental professionals in the United States (U.S.).
methodsA nationwide, cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 193 dental practitioners. The survey assessed demographics, management preferences by perforation size, timing of repair, material selection factors, and self-reported comfort levels. Associations between practitioner characteristics and management choices were analyzed using Cramer’s V. Multivariate logistic regressions were also performed to evaluate independent predictors of (1) management choice, and (2) timing of repair.
resultsMost respondents were male (72.8%) and mid-career practitioners. Management approaches varied by perforation size: collagen-based materials were common for small defects (0–2 mm), while specialist referral and flap techniques predominated for larger perforations (> 7 mm). 81% performed closure on the same day. Ease of use was the main factor guiding material choice (33.7%). Specialization showed a strong association with management approach (Cramer’s V = 0.654, p < 0.001), and experience with OAC cases was moderately to strongly related (Cramer’s V = 0.403, p = 0.007). In multivariate analyses, experience managing sinus perforations and self-rated confidence were associated with management choice, while no practitioner characteristics were independently associated with timing of repair.
conclusionRespondents demonstrated size-dependent escalation in OAC management, but variability persisted in technique and material selection. Adjusted analyses suggest that experience-related factors are more closely linked to material selection for moderate defects, whereas timing of repair appears relatively consistent across practitioner characteristics. These findings highlight the need for standardized, outcomes-informed guidance and targeted training to improve consistency and optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.