SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in asthmatic children: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a multidimensional nomogram integrating PIV, LDH, and FeNO for predicting poor asthma control in school-aged children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Systemic immune-inflammation index combined with blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio predicts 28-day mortality in sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) between asthmatic and healthy children and to investigate the predictive role of PLR and NLR for asthma exacerbation. Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and Medline were systematically searched up to August 2025. The search strategy was described by a combination of relevant medical subheadings (MeSH) and keywords. Eligible English language studies were reviewed, and their quality was appraised. This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 13 studies, including 15,250 individuals, met the inclusion criteria. Asthmatic children had significantly higher NLR (SMD 0.852) and PLR (SMD 0.412) than the control group (P-value < 0.05). Exacerbated children had higher NLR (MD 2.5, P-value < 0.05) and PLR (MD 33.62, P-value > 0.05) at presentation compared to after 3 months follow-up. NLR with a cut-off of 1.738 (accuracy of 88%) and PLR with a cut-off of 128.15 (accuracy of 69.8%) can predict exacerbation in asthmatic pediatrics. Also, NLR with a cut-off of 1.335 (accuracy of 76.5%) can distinguish asthmatic from healthy children.
conclusionThis systematic review discovered that PLR and NLR are increased in asthmatic children, and any changes in clinical situation such as superinfection and exacerbation can change their level. Moreover, NLR and PLR can predict exacerbation, and NLR can even distinguish asthmatic from healthy children. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Asthma is diagnosed by classic methods such as spirometry, which cannot be used in younger children and cannot predict exacerbation. • A vital role in the inflammatory orchestra of asthma is played by activation of mast cells, which is mediated by a variety of markers, including neutrophils, platelets, lymphocytes, and macrophages. WHAT IS NEW: • Mean PLR and NLR are increased in asthmatic children, and any changes in clinical situation such as superinfection and exacerbation can change their level. • NLR and PLR can predict exacerbation, and NLR can even distinguish asthmatic from healthy children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41612030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.