Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41612015›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

Physiological and behavioural responses of wandering albatross chicks (Diomedea exulans) to novel and non-novel predators.

Anais Cotton, Christophe Barbraud, Sarah Leclaire, Karine Delord, Aymeric Bodin, Antoine Stier, Cécile Ribout, Charline Parenteau, Jean-Baptiste Ferdy, Charlotte Bourgoin and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anais CottonCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), UMR 5300, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse INP, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France. anais.cotton@utoulouse.fr.
Christophe BarbraudCentre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS - La Rochelle Université, UMR 7372, 79360, Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Sarah LeclaireCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), UMR 5300, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse INP, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France.
Karine DelordCentre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS - La Rochelle Université, UMR 7372, 79360, Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Aymeric BodinRéserve Naturelle Nationale des Terres Australes Françaises, TAAF, rue Gabriel Dejean, 97458, Saint-Pierre, France.
Antoine StierUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Cécile RiboutCentre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS - La Rochelle Université, UMR 7372, 79360, Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Charline ParenteauCentre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS - La Rochelle Université, UMR 7372, 79360, Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Jean-Baptiste FerdyCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), UMR 5300, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse INP, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France.
Charlotte BourgoinCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), UMR 5300, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse INP, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France.
Joël WhiteCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), UMR 5300, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse INP, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France.
Frédéric AngelierCentre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS - La Rochelle Université, UMR 7372, 79360, Villiers-en-Bois, France. frederic.angelier@cebc.cnrs.fr.
Pierrick BlanchardCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), UMR 5300, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse INP, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse, France. pierrick.blanchard@utoulouse.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In long-standing predator-prey systems, prey typically evolve costly responses to predation risk. How prey respond to novel predators is less investigated. We explored physiological (corticosterone, triglyceride), morphological (body condition) and behavioural (defensive posture) responses of wandering albatross (Diomedea exulans) chicks to a novel predator, the feral cat (Felis catus) in Kerguelen archipelago. We implemented a semi-experimental design to increase the variance in cat abundance by regulating cat populations in certain zones of the study colony. The aforementioned chick traits were then monitored and analysed at the zone scale, by comparing nests located within regulated and non-regulated zones, and at the nest scale, by recording cat abundance through intensive camera traps monitoring. This fine-scale approach further enabled us to investigate how chicks responded to southern giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus), an opportunistic predator-scavenger that has co-evolved with albatrosses. Cat abundances had no effect on chick traits. In contrast, higher abundances of giant petrel were associated with an elevated rate of corticosterone increase and lower triglyceride levels. In accordance with these results suggesting a more accurate perception of predation risk mediated by giant petrels than by cats, chicks were more prone to display a defensive posture when facing a giant petrel than a cat. We discuss these results in the light of contrasting evolutionary histories and predation patterns between albatrosses and their predators, and we emphasise that studies of predator impacts on prey populations must consider both the direct and indirect effects of all predators, as well as their interactions.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalBirdsPredatory BehaviorAnimalsCatsCorticosteroneTriglyceridesCorticosteroneTriglyceridesEco-physiologyFeral catsLandscape of fearPredation riskPredator noveltyPredator-prey relationships

Identifiers

PMID41612015
PMCPMC13198508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.