Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2026
Assessing quality of life in anal fistula patients after Seton placement using different knot types: Randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05348473 (Comparison of the Effects of Different Seton Application Techniques on the Quality of Life in the Postoperative Period in Perianal Fistula Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of the Effects of Different Seton Application Techniques on the Quality of Life in the Postoperative Period in Perianal Fistula Disease
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePerianal fistula is a common disease that significantly affects the quality of life of patients. Several treatment options are available; loose seton is one of the most popular options. Aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between quality of life and different types of knots used during the application of anal fistula.
methodsPatients who presented with anal fistulas between 2021 and 2024 were included in this study. Patients were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the type of knot used for treatment. In group A, the seton ends were tied in the alpha configuration. In group B, a ring-like seton with overlapping ends was used. In group C, a knotless seton was applied. All patients completed the quality of life assessment with the Anal Fistula Questionnaire at 15, 30, and 90 days after surgery.
resultsSixty-three patients were randomized. A total of 52 men were included. Median age was 43 years. Three patients in group C and five patients in group B experienced complications, including abscess, anal pain, loss of seton, and second fistula. Physical and mental component scores revealed that postoperative quality of life was similar among the three groups.
conclusionNo differences in postoperative quality of life among groups were observed at 15, 30, or 90 days after surgery. Physical and mental component scores of quality of life in patients in Anal Fistula Questionnaire revealed that quality of life improved over time in all three groups. CLINICAL
trial registrationThe study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Study ID: NCT05348473, date: 04/29/2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.