Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41611980›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2026

Detection Strategies for Begomoviruses: A Focus Review of Methods.

Nguyen Hoai Nguyen, Quynh Xuan Thi Luong, Thuy Thi Bich Vo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nguyen Hoai NguyenFaculty of Biotechnology, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Quynh Xuan Thi LuongFaculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thuy Thi Bich VoFaculty of Biotechnology, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. thuy.vtb@ou.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9719-974X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Begomovirus, the largest genus within the family Geminiviridae, poses a significant threat to global agriculture, resulting in substantial economic losses across diverse cropping systems. The increasing incidence and geographic spread of begomoviruses are driven by both the emergence of novel viral strains and the adaptation of existing ones, complicating efforts to manage the disease effectively. Traditional techniques, such as PCR and ELISA, have long been the primary methods used for detecting begomoviruses. However, recent advancements have introduced modern detection techniques designed to improve speed and accuracy. Additionally, some techniques can also be applied in the field with commercial products, enhancing the practical efficiency of begomoviruses detection. This review summarizes the most used methods for begomoviruses detection and provides a comparative assessment of the strengths and limitations of each technique. Based on this, it will assist researchers in gaining a comprehensive overview of detection methods and their applications in studying this plant virus genus. Consequently, researchers can select the optimal detection method for their studies without expending excessive time and resources.

Indexed as

BegomovirusPlant DiseasesDNA, ViralNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, ViralBegomovirusesIsothermal amplification techniquesMolecular detectionPCR-based diagnosticsViral identification methodologies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.