ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Results of a multigene panel testing approach targeting patients with suspected genetic predisposition to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer: Genetic Risk, Surveillance Strategies, and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma occur in the context of a suspected or proven genetic predisposition in 5-10% of cases. While universal germline multigene panel testing is currently recommended by NCCN and ASCO, this approach was previously limited to patients with personal and/or family criteria suggestive of hereditary predisposition. We report the results of this « selective » approach applied in our institution from January 2018 to June 2023. Germline testing of a panel of 13 « clinically actionable » genes (APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11) was performed in 496 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and suspected genetic predisposition based on the validation of prespecified clinical criteria. A germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant of one of these genes was identified in 49 patients corresponding to 9.9% of the study population. ATM and BRCA2 were the two most frequently implicated genes (18 and 16 cases, respectively) and the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants of these genes was significantly higher than in gnomAD controls. The overall contribution of core and non-core genes of the Homologous Recombination DNA repair system was 83.7% while the contribution of the Mismatch Repair system was 10.2%. An exploratory approach consisting of unmasking the results of the NGS analysis of 123 « research » genes involved in the carcinogenesis was applied to the 447 patients tested negative for the different genes of our diagnostic panel. This approach failed to identify other susceptibility genes to pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.