ArticleHeredity2026
The evolution of tandem repeat sequences under partial selfing and different modes of selection.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- T2T genomes ofGenome research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tandem repeat (TR) sequences occur when short DNA motifs are repeated head-to-tail along chromosomes and are a major source of genetic variation. Population genetic models of TR evolution have focused on large, randomly mating, haploid populations. Yet many organisms reproduce partially through self-fertilisation ('selfing'), which increases homozygosity and thus may alter the evolutionary processes shaping TR sequences. Here we use mathematical modelling and simulations to study the evolution of homologous TR sequences in partially selfing, diploid populations under four different selective regimes that may be relevant to TRs: (i) additive purifying selection, (ii) truncation-like purifying selection, (iii) selection against heterozygotes due to misalignment costs, and (iv) stabilising selection favouring an intermediate TR sequence length. We show that selfing influences TR evolution primarily by increasing homozygosity, with two main consequences: (1) it enhances the variation produced by unequal recombination within individuals, and (2) it increases variation between individuals. Consequently, selection on TRs becomes more effective under partial selfing across all modes of selection considered, resulting in lower genetic load, despite higher genetic drift. Overall, our results suggest that mating systems and inbreeding are important factors shaping variation in TR sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.