ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimization of the extraction process of Sanhuang Qingre Formula by integrating response surface methodology, grey correlation analysis, and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to optimize the ethanol reflux extraction process of the Sanhuang Qingre Formula (SHQRF) using response surface methodology (RSM), grey correlation analysis (GCA), and machine learning. A combination of single-factor experiments and a Box-Behnken design (BBD) was applied to optimize three key variables: ethanol concentration, reflux time, and liquid-solid ratio. During the experiments, the comprehensive score—calculated from the contents of 11 bioactive components (coptisine, epiberberine, berberine hydrochloride, palmatine, baicalin, chrysin-7-O-β-glucuronide, wogonoside, baicalein, wogonin, oroxylin A, atractylodin) and extraction yield—was used as the evaluation index. The combined weighting method of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method was employed to determine the comprehensive score. Results showed that the process optimized by RSM and the support vector machine (SVM) model achieved a higher comprehensive score of 56.08 compared with that of 52.67 obtained by GCA optimization. Consequently, the optimal extraction parameters for SHQRF were determined as follows: ethanol concentration of 55%, reflux time of 2 h per cycle, and a liquid-solid ratio of 12 mL/g. The optimized process significantly increased the individual and total contents of the 11 target components compared with the original process (the pre-optimization process). Furthermore, the original process, the GCA-optimized process, and the optimal processes derived from RSM and SVM were distinctly classified by hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA). This study provides an effective strategy to enhance the extraction efficiency and quality of SHQRF and offers new insights and approaches for optimizing the extraction of active components in traditional Chinese medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.