Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41611943›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cancer classification with radiomics in controlled preclinical models.

Kyle Drover, David A Simon Davis, Katharine Gosling, Jason Price, Naomi Otoo, Ines Atmosukarto, Kylie Jung, Hany Elsaleh, Farhan M Syed, Benjamin J C Quah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kyle DroverIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Division of Genome Sciences and Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
David A Simon DavisIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Division of Genome Sciences and Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Katharine GoslingIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Division of Genome Sciences and Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Jason PriceDivision of Immunology and Infectious Disease, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Naomi OtooDivision of Genome Sciences and Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Ines AtmosukartoDivision of Immunology and Infectious Disease, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Kylie JungIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Division of Genome Sciences and Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Hany ElsalehIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Division of Genome Sciences and Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Farhan M SyedIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Division of Genome Sciences and Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Benjamin J C QuahIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Division of Genome Sciences and Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. ben.quah@anu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The premise of radiomics involves extracting high-dimensional quantitative features from medical images to aid clinical decision-making. While radiomics has shown promise in predicting disease characteristics, concerns regarding confounders, reproducibility, and interpretability limit its clinical adoption. In this study, we assessed the ability of radiomic features extracted from contoured CT images to classify two distinct tumour models, CT26 colorectal cancer (CRC) and 4T1 breast cancer (BC), in a highly controlled murine setting. We aimed to provide compelling data for the role of radiomics as a reliable cancer biomarker. We benchmarked radiomics-based classification against previously established blood-based biomarkers, including leukocyte populations and plasma proteins. Feature filtering reduced the original 1409 radiomic features to 18 non-redundant, high-importance predictors, primarily texture-based transformations. Unsupervised clustering via UMAP revealed that radiomics-based features did not segregate tumour types as effectively as blood biomarkers, suggesting potential confounding factors. Supervised machine learning using Random Forest showed that radiomic features achieved a classification accuracy of 0.87, lower than the 0.96 and 0.99 accuracies obtained with cell and plasma biomarkers, respectively. Furthermore, integrating radiomics with blood biomarkers did not enhance classification performance, and feature importance analysis using SHAP identified blood-based markers as the dominant predictors. These findings suggest that while radiomics retains some predictive value, it is less effective than blood biomarkers in this classification task and does not significantly contribute to multimodal tumour classification models. Our study underscores the need for further standardization and validation of radiomics before its clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsRadiomicsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorClassification AlgorithmsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiceTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersCancerMedical imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41611943
PMCPMC12913988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.