Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41611921›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting compressive strength of mortars containing recycled CRT glass using GMDH and GEP methods.

Vahid Ghorbani, Ali Seyedkazemi, Saman Soleimani Kutanaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vahid GhorbaniDepartment of Civil Engineering, Am.C., Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.
Ali SeyedkazemiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Am.C., Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran. ali.seyedkazemi@iau.ac.ir.
Saman Soleimani KutanaeiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Am.C., Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing volume of industrial and electronic waste has intensified the need for sustainable material management strategies. Among these waste streams, cathode-ray-tube (CRT) glass is of particular concern due to its high density and lead-bearing composition, which typically contains about 20–25 wt.% lead oxide. Using recycled CRT glass (RCRT) as a fine aggregate in cementitious mixtures offers a practical means of reducing landfill disposal while enhancing mortar performance. However, the mechanical behavior of RCRT-containing mortars has not been sufficiently modeled, thereby constraining the optimized design of such sustainable mixtures. In this study, two white-box, soft-computing techniques, the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Gene Expression Programming (GEP), were developed to predict the compressive strength of mortars incorporating RCRT. The database consisted of 139 laboratory specimens, and the machine-learning models were trained using the following input variables: water-to-binder ratio (w/b), water content, cement content (CC), fly ash, sand content, RCRT content, and curing time (CT). The GMDH model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an R2 of 0.942 with RMSE and MAE values of 2.97 and 2.59, respectively. In contrast, the GEP model produced higher error levels (RMSE = 6.94 and MAE = 5.28). These findings indicate that transparent, data-driven modeling can capture the nonlinear interactions governing strength development in RCRT-modified mortars and provides a reliable basis for designing sustainable, dense, and mechanically efficient mixtures suitable for both conventional and radiation-shielding applications.

Indexed as

Cement mortarCompressive strengthGene expression programmingGroup method of data handlingRecycled cathode ray tubeSoft computing

Identifiers

PMID41611921
PMCPMC12913775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.