ArticleBrain informatics2026
Modeling 3D mesoscaled neuronal complexity through learning-based dynamic morphometric convolution.
Article in Brain informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate reconstruction of neuronal morphology from three-dimensional (3D) light microscopy is fundamental to neuroscience. Nevertheless, neuronal arbors intrinsically exhibit slender, tortuous geometries with high orientation variability, posing significant challenges for standard 3D convolutions whose static, axis-aligned receptive fields lack adaptability to such complex morphology. To address this, we propose the Dynamic Morph-Aware Convolution (DMAC) framework, which incorporates inherent geometric priors into convolution by jointly adapting both the shape and orientation of the kernel. This enables morphology-aware feature extraction tailored to arborized and variably oriented neuronal trajectories. Specifically, we first apply dynamic tubular convolutions to bridge the structural mismatch between isotropic convolution kernels and the slender morphology of neurons. To sufficiently accommodate the 3D orientation variability of neuronal branches, we further introduce a rotation mechanism that dynamically reorients the tubular kernel via two learnable angles (elevation and azimuth), enabling precise alignment with local neuronal directions. We validate our method through extensive experiments on four mesoscaled neuronal imaging datasets, including two from the BigNeuron project (Drosophila and Mouse) and two additional benchmarks (NeuroFly and CWMBS). Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving average improvements of 5.4% in Entire Structure Average (ESA), 6.9% in Different Structure Average (DSA), and 7.5% in Percentage of Different Structure (PDS). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed DMAC in capturing complex morphological variations and enhancing structural fidelity across diverse mesoscaled neuronal morphologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.