ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026
An integrated cell and medium engineering approach for production of a nanobody fusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an established production host for therapeutic proteins; many of those are small proteins such as insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs. Contrastingly, proteins of higher molecular weight, foremost antibodies, did not reach the market due, among other factors, to limiting productivity. Here we addressed the loss of product to protein degradation through a combination of genetic engineering of the host and medium optimization. We screened target genes that either directly or indirectly can lead to proteolytic degradation. We identified four deletions that are beneficial for expression: PEP1 and VPS30, which both can channel proteins to the vacuole for degradation; MON2, which can lead to the re-uptake of secreted proteins; and ALG3, which can affect the permeability of the cell wall. In parallel, we developed a small-scale fed-batch cultivation system for 24-well deep well plate cultivations and using an amino acid-rich medium. To stabilize secreted proteins, we screened chemical chaperones and osmolytes. We fortified the medium with arginine, 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PBA), and Tween-20. Using the engineered yeast strain, which features VPS30, PEP1, and ALG3 deletions, and the small-scale fed-batch system, we obtained 2.5 µg/mL of a secreted chimeric fusion of a nanobody to the crystallizable fragment (Fc) of a human immunoglobulin. Instrumental to the increase in the final titer were the reduced losses. This was achieved by a combination of complementary measures: improving diffusion through the cell wall, achieved through genetic engineering, and reducing losses to proteolytic degradation through medium optimization and genetic engineering. Moreover, we showed that the engineered strain and cultivation set-up are suitable for the production of different antibodies. KEY POINTS: • Chemical chaperones and amino acid-rich medium increased secreted protein titers. • Medium and host engineering are instrumental for improving productivity. • Small-scale cultivation system enables production levels suitable for characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.