ArticleScientific reports2026
A lightweight neural network approach for predicting national Gross Domestic Product (LightNet-GDP) with regression benchmarks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is one of the most important factors to determine the economic state and performance of a country. The correct prediction of GDP is crucial in the development of the fiscal policy, investment and in socio-economic planning. This study makes the following contribution: the first attempt to adopt a lightweight neural network architecture with a unique design to predict GDP is compared to a number of other well-known regression models. When carrying out the study, one starts with thorough data preprocessing, which refers to removing the noise, the treatment of missing values, and normalizing it. In order to be able to make some assumptions about the patterns and relationships between features, statistical summaries and data visualizations were conducted as part of Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA). As the benchmark models, multiple regression models were created and optimized, such as Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Decision Tree Regressor, XGBoost Regressor and etc., All models were tested with a set of performance metrics in terms of accuracy, i.e., Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), R2 Score, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Root Mean Square Logarithmic Error (RMSLE). The lightweight neural network proposed and fine-tuned with the purpose of achieving a higher training accuracy as well as the best generalization performance, performed outstandingly on all assessment measures. The model combines residual learning, batch normalization, dropout based regularization and kernel constraints to improve generalization while keeping the architecture simple. A five-fold cross-validation is used to ensure reliability and to avoid the possibility of overfitting. Also, the resilience of the model was measured quantitatively by a robustness test at structural noise perturbations, which is the case of non-stationary economic dynamics. The findings have shown a high predictive performance with a moderate R2 score and a stability ratio of 1.02, which is a good indicator of high resilience to changes in inputs. The proposed model was found to have a better predictive performance and significantly lower error scores for MAE, RMSE and computational cost than traditional regression methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.