ArticleScientific reports2026
Structural and physicochemical stability of 3D-printed bolus materials used in radiotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In radiotherapy, boluses ensure dose buildup at the skin and adapt to complex anatomy, requiring stable, well-conforming materials. This study aimed to investigate the effect of ionising radiation (70 Gy, 6 MV) on changes in the physicochemical properties of two materials used for 3D printing bolus materials for radiotherapy: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene ABS and thermoplastic copolyester TPC. Surface roughness, tribological parameters, hardness, dimensional stability, Fourier transform infrared spectra FTIR, and differential scanning calorimetry DSC data were assessed. After irradiation, small statistically significant changes in roughness parameters were observed for both materials, with ABS exhibiting greater surface degradation. In tribological tests, ABS demonstrated a 70% reduction in coefficient of friction, while TPC remained stable. FTIR spectra revealed changes characteristic of ABS degradation and oxidation (decreases in the intensity of butadiene bands, CH₂ shifts, and increases in carbonyl bands). Subtle chemical stability and potential cross-linking were observed in TPC. DSC suggests no changes in TPC and a decrease in the glass transition temperature of ABS, suggesting slight structural degradation. A slight increase in hardness was observed in ABS and TPC after irradiation, with only minimal dimensional changes in ABS. Based on the data obtained, X-ray radiation affected the tested materials differently. Although both retain their function after exposure to therapeutic doses, TPC exhibits greater chemical and mechanical resistance. Combined with its greater flexibility, this may result in improved clinical adhesion and reproducibility during radiotherapy. Further studies will include analysis of adhesion and dose distribution (Part 2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.