ArticleScientific reports2026
A case study discovering lock-in effects of culinary culture and behaviours on cooking energy use in Chinese homes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergy-Based Sustainability Evaluation and Optimization Scenarios for 341 Chinese Home-Cooked Dishes.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
China’s rapid urbanization and industrialization have expanded building floorspace and contributed to rising carbon emissions in the building sector. An often-overlooked aspect of residential energy use is cooking, which this study examines through two longitudinal household case studies, combined with a questionnaire survey of 202 households. Monitoring results show that cooking accounted for 23% and 48% of total household energy consumption in the two cases, confirming its significant contribution to the residential carbon footprint. To further investigate the observed highly linear growth in cooking energy use in both households, a questionnaire survey was further conducted, revealing a lock-in effect correlating cooking energy with family life cycle (FLC) stages and habitual cooking practices, rather than with family size per se. To quantify this relationship, this study proposes a novel indicator, Cooking Energy Use Intensity (CookEUI), defined as the average daily cooking energy consumption (kWh/day). CookEUI ranges from 4.13 to 5.10 kWh/day for elderly and middle-aged couples, increases to approximately 6–7 kWh/day for two-generation households, and reaches 8.13–12.86 kWh/day for three-generation households with dependent children. Survey responses further indicate that cooking energy is strongly constrained by culturally embedded culinary behaviours. Our findings suggest potential solutions to reduce cooking energy use and emissions – such as alternative cooking appliances, cleaner energy sources, and community dining options – while respecting entrenched culinary culture, providing valuable insights for sustainable residential cooking practice and supporting efforts to reduce household carbon emissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.