ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Integrated predictive model for visceral pleural invasion in small NSCLC with high clinical utility.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Foundation model-enhanced multimodal radiomics for predicting response to chemo-immunotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to develop and validate a multi-feature integrated imaging fusion (MIIF) model, incorporating deep learning, radiomics features, and computed tomography (CT) findings, for identifying visceral pleural invasion (VPI) in small non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This multi-center retrospective analysis included 2822 small NSCLCs. These were divided into four datasets (training, validation, internal/external test). The MIIF model's diagnostic performance was compared against the assessments of six radiologists. Additionally, we evaluated the clinical utility of the MIIF model by comparing the diagnostic performance of radiologists, with/without the aid of the model. The MIIF model yielded AUCs of 0.869/0.785 in the internal/external test sets, respectively, which were comparable to the radiologists' (P > 0.05). With MIIF assistance, radiologists' accuracy and specificity increased to 0.845/0.828 and 0.836/0.841 in the internal/external test sets (P < 0.001). The MIIF model shows enhanced accuracy and specificity in detecting VPI in small NSCLC and may improve radiologist' diagnostic performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.