ArticleScientific reports2026
Real time identification of phishing attacks through machine learning enhanced browser extensions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phishing attack continues to rank among the deadliest online threats. They create phony websites in an attempt to obtain personal data. This study offers a framework for a browser extension that uses machine learning to examine URLs and visual components in Google Chrome in order to identify phishing websites in real-time. Using support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF) algorithms, the suggested system gathers and examines data from websites, extracts hybrid elements including lexical, structural, and visual layout parameters, and arranges them. The best traits that can distinguish between items are found using the grey wolf optimizer (GWO). This reduces computer power consumption and facilitates finding items. GWO enhanced the random forest model, which performed well on benchmark datasets such as the Berkeley ML Archives and PhishTank. On the MCC test, it received a score of 0.96 and had an accuracy rate of 98.7%.This method is used by the Chrome extension to assess URLs for visual similarity in real time and display warnings to users that change according to their actions.The proposed system is better than current anti-phishing solutions because it works better in real time, has a lower false-positive rate, and can handle obfuscated URLs. This project makes a useful, user-centered defense system that can protect against phishing attacks that change over time by using smart security at the browser level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.