ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid CNN and reinforcement learning framework for speaker identification using Mel-Spectrogram and continuous wavelet transform features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of data augmentation and backbone architecture selection on dental caries segmentation in panoramic radiographs: a comparative deep learning study using pre-trained U-Net models.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Enhancing corporate bankruptcy prediction and customer relationship sustainability through CNN-based financial feature transformation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The adaptive engagement framework: enhancing banking customer experience through AI-powered invisible marketing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speaker identification remains critical in biometric authentication systems, requiring robust feature extraction strategies that capture speaker-specific vocal characteristics. This study introduces a hybrid deep learning architecture integrating Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with Reinforcement Learning (RL) for confidence-aware speaker identification. Two feature extraction methodologies were compared: Method 1 employed Mel-spectrogram representations (80 bins, 20-8000 Hz) with self-attention mechanisms, while Method 2 utilized Continuous Wavelet Transform with Morlet wavelets (128 scales). Both methods were implemented as hybrid CNN-RL architectures and compared against CNN-only baselines. Frameworks were evaluated on LibriSpeech dev-clean dataset (2,703 audio files, 40 speakers) through stratified 5-fold cross-validation. ANOVA assessed discriminative capacity of 22 acoustic features. ANOVA revealed 21 of 22 features demonstrated significant discriminative power (p < 0.05), with entropy exhibiting the strongest effect (F = 39.79, η² = 0.37). Method 1 achieved 87.60% accuracy (95% CI: [83.60%, 91.95%]) and ROC-AUC of 99.54%. Method 2 attained 77.60% accuracy (95% CI: [73.12%, 82.08%]) with ROC-AUC of 98.21%. Ablation studies demonstrated that RL integration provided statistically significant improvements over CNN-only baselines (Method 1: +2.80%, p = 0.0142; Method 2: +3.40%, p = 0.0089) with reduced performance variability. Both architectures demonstrated balanced metrics with Matthews Correlation Coefficients exceeding 0.76. Q-learning integration enabled adaptive decision-making for classification uncertainty, with ablation studies confirming quantitative contributions over conventional CNNs. Results demonstrate that Mel-scale representations with attention mechanisms provide superior discriminative capacity compared to fixed-resolution wavelet transforms for robust biometric authentication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.