ArticleScientific reports2026
A lightweight YOLO11n seg framework for real time surface crack detection with segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MCL-YOLO: A Multi-Module Collaborative Lightweight Object Detection Method for Bridge Crack Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-Time Interface-Opening Detection for Nickel Starting Sheet Pre-Stripping Based on an Improved YOLO11n.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recognition of superficial cracks is essential to ensure the safety, durability, and longevity of civil infrastructure such as bridges, pavements, tunnels, and buildings. Traditional crack detection methods have been largely based on manual inspections and classical image processing techniques, including edge detection, thresholding, and morphological operations. With the rapid advancement of computer vision and deep learning, significant progress has been made in automating crack detection. To gain insight into previous research, we reviewed some studies from the past few years and identified YOLO11 as the most suitable model for crack detection tasks. In this study, we propose a deep learning-based framework for surface crack detection using the Crack-Seg dataset and the YOLO11n-seg architecture. Experimental results demonstrate that YOLO11n-seg achieves strong performance on the Crack-Seg dataset. The suggested model reaches a Precision of 78.8%, which is comparable to heavy baselines. Our results show that the suggested lightweight model, with just 2.8 million parameters, has a Box mAP@50 of 76.2% with a Mask mAP@50 of 58.7%. Most importantly, the model reaches an inference rate of 3.6ms for each image (on Tesla T4), allowing for ultra-fast processing in highly automated inspection systems. These findings establish a new benchmark for edge-deployable crack recognition, demonstrating the possibility that the YOLO11n-seg architecture may provide acceptable segmentation performance with lower computational cost than large, traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.