ArticleScientific reports2026
Accuracy of DentalMonitoring's artificial intelligence in detecting common orthodontic braces treatment related emergencies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DentalMonitoring™ (DM) (Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France), an FDA-cleared AI-powered orthodontic remote monitoring software, in detecting three common orthodontic appliance issues: bracket debonding, open self-ligating clips, and tie loss. Datasets from 1,014 US-based patients were analyzed. Each DM image set was assessed by the AI algorithm and independently reviewed by a panel of three orthodontic experts, whose consensus served as the reference standard. A total of 659 evaluations were included for bracket debonding, 647 for self-ligating clip status, and 653 for tie presence. Sensitivity and specificity along with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a two-level evaluation basis (positive vs. negative) across the three clinical parameters. DM's AI demonstrated high diagnostic performance, with sensitivity of 98.4% for bracket debonding, 91.1% for open self-ligating clips, and 93.3% for tie loss. Corresponding specificity values were 99.6%, 88.3%, and 96.5%, respectively. Current results indicate that DM's AI analysis system has high accuracy in detecting bracket debonding, open self-ligating clips, and tie loss. DM can help significantly reduce the rate of these undetected clinical incidents, providing a better approach to managing emergencies and maintaining clinical control in orthodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.