ArticleScientific reports2026
Sunscreen application substantially mitigates molecular perturbations induced by repetitive UV exposure and maintains healthy skin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- UVB photoprotection by thiourea and (thio)semicarbazone derivatives: cellular and molecular evidence.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Skin Aging and Its Reversal to Improve Skin Longevity across Ethnicities and Phototypes Using a Dihydromyricetin-Containing Serum: Results from a Prospective, Single-Cohort Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a key environmental factor contributing to photoaging, inflammation, and carcinogenesis. While sunscreen is known to prevent sunburn and lower cancer risk, its effectiveness in limiting UV-induced molecular alterations in human skin is not fully defined. In this study, 32 female volunteers belonging to four Fitzpatrick phototypes underwent repeated moderate UV exposures, with skin samples collected from three distinct treatment sites on each participant, including untreated, UV-exposed without protection, and UV-exposed with prior application of sunscreen. Comprehensive profiling revealed that UV exposure markedly altered gene expression and DNA methylation, impacting pathways involved in DNA repair, immune response, and cell cycle regulation. Mapping these molecular signatures to the Hallmarks of Health revealed broad disturbance of the skin's core functional attributes. The application of sunscreen effectively prevented most UV-driven disruptions, including the acceleration of epigenetic age, and maintained the stability of hallmark-associated pathways, with minor residual molecular changes remaining. This study demonstrates the importance of regular photoprotection in preventing visible skin damage and maintaining molecular skin health. By deepening our understanding of the mechanisms underlying photoprotection, these findings also indicate a new scope for further advancements in the efficacy of future sunscreen formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.