ArticleScientific reports2026
PhysEmbedFormer: a physics-guided interpretable architecture for days-ahead forecasting of PV power.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Days-ahead forecasting of photovoltaic (PV) power generation is crucial for pricing and balancing the renewable power grids. The traditional physics-based models offer trade-off interpretability with limited accuracy, whereas the attention-based data-driven models have high predictive accuracy, but limited interpretability. The accurate predictions of PV power are challenging due to stochastic, weather-dependent nature of solar radiation, which induces distribution shifts and non-stationary patterns in the time series data. This paper addresses some of these limitations by proposing a novel physics-guided architecture termed PhysEmbedFormer for forecasting the PV power data in the context of meteorological data. It offers improved interpretability, and forecasting robustness by accounting for the external weather-dependent factors. In particular, the input PV time series are first decomposed into the physics-estimated component and the residual component. The components are jointly embedded into a high-dimensional vector-space using the cross-modality module. The subsequent dual-stage Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) refinement module represent a learnable non-linear transformation to better match the sample distributions to simpler downstream forecasting models such as the previously proposed iTransformer. Extensive experiments on multiple PV datasets show that PhysEmbedFormer achieves consistently lower MAE, RMSE, and higher [Formula: see text] than other competing architectures across different prediction horizons up to 72 hours. At the same time, PhysEmbedFormer experiences the second narrowest 95% confidence interval in its predictions, so it is also robust to sample distribution shifts due to changes in the present weather conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.