ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-source physiological data-driven method for assessing the hazard perception level of operators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the continuous advancement of coal mine intelligence, unmanned operations at the working face have become an inevitable trend, and the safety monitoring center plays a central role in ensuring mine safety. Its operation relies not only on system monitoring but also on operators’ timely perception and judgment of hazard information. Therefore, the hazard perception level of operators is critical for accident prevention and safety management. In this context, an experiment is conducted to assess the hazard perception levels of safety monitoring center operators. Physiological signals, including electroencephalogram (EEG), electrodermal activity (EDA), and heart rate variability (HRV), are collected during hazard perception tasks. Using these physiological signals in conjunction with machine learning and deep learning methods, a high-accuracy hazard perception assessment model is developed, and its performance is evaluated using reliable metrics. The results show that certain features derived from all three physiological signals exhibit distinct responses corresponding to different hazard perception levels. The LightGBM model achieves the highest performance, with an accuracy of 99.89%. Furthermore, the study demonstrates the feasibility of high-accuracy hazard perception assessment based on the combined use of EEG, EDA, and HRV signals. These findings provide a practical pathway for future coal mine safety management, enhance the capacity for accident prevention in intelligent coal mines, and offer strong support for safe production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.