ArticleScientific reports2026
Metadata driven malicious URL detection using RoBERTa large and multi source network threat intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we address the critical security challenge of detecting malicious URLs, which serve as primary cause for website phishing, malware attacks, and website defacement. Detection of malicious links has remained active research in Artificial Intelligence as machine learning (ML) models and deep learning (DL) are applied in this regard. The use of sequential models captures character-level patterns but remain vulnerable to novel adversarial manipulations. This study proposes to apply state of the art large language model which are dual-mechanism, RoBERTa-Large transformers that combine contextualized subword embeddings with lightweight metadata signals via attention layers. Fine-tuned on a balanced dataset encompassing benign, defacement, phishing, and malware URLs, the model achieves 98% overall accuracy substantially outperforming ML and DL models. To enhance interpretability, SHAP and LIME explainability analysis, confirming that features such as URL length, slash depth, and entropy drive predictions, while the transformer's attention heads isolate subtle lexical anomalies. The empirical analysis-based findings demonstrate that integrating metadata attention with a masked language model yields state-of-the-art performance and transparent decision-making for real-world malicious URL detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.