ArticleScientific reports2026
SENTINEL-DL: a forensic framework for device attribution using motion sensor data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces SENTINEL-DL-a novel forensic framework which leverages accelerometer sensory data to associate motion-based digital evidence to its corresponding smartphone or smartwatch models. SENTINEL-DL analyzes robust tamper-resistant intrinsic motion signatures (profiled using built-in 3D accelerometers) to establish device associations. Technically speaking, it leverages small differences in linear acceleration to identify and associate the readings with its generating device. SENTINEL-DL utilizes machine learning models including random forest (RF), deep neural networks (DNN) and convolutional neural networks (CNN) to drive its association during the matching process, i.e., unknown sensory data against a reference database containing device profiles from known sources. The results of empirical tests show that SENTINEL-DL for smartphones and smartwatches, respectively, achieves a true positive rate (TPR) of 93.99% and 92.65%, a false acceptance rate (FAR) of 0.66% and 1.22%, and an overall accuracy of 98.76% and 98.97%. SENTINEL-DL being light-weight promises investigators a dependable analysis solution for motion sensor evidence while providing digital fingerprinting capabilities and forensic authentication support. The research demonstrates how motion sensor data can be utilized in digital forensic investigations to develop improved device fingerprinting and forensic verification methodologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.