ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting postoperative delirium after lung cancer resection: the utility of synthetic data and LIME algorithm for model interpretation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and interpretability of a machine learning model for postoperative hypothermia prediction in placenta previa Cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Prediction Models for Postoperative Delirium Among Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Investigating the utilization of LIME-enhanced AI and generated data for evaluating the risks associated with radial artery puncture procedures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To construct an efficient predictive model for post-lung cancer resection delirium (POD) using artificial intelligence, with a focus on leveraging synthetic data (generated via the Synthetic Data Vault [SDV] framework) in small-sample training scenarios. Additionally, we aim to enhance clinical interpretability through a locally interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) method, thereby addressing the existing research gap in AI-driven POD prediction following pneumonectomy. The SDV framework was employed to generate 2,000 synthetic data points (serving as the training set), while real-world data from Figshare (n = 570 cases, used as the test set) were utilized to validate the model. Twelve machine learning algorithms (e.g., Gaussian Naive Bayes [GNB] and random forest) were incorporated, with performance metrics including accuracy, recall, and AUC evaluated via 50% cross-validation. LIME was applied to interpret individual sample predictions and analyze the contributions of key features to POD risk In this study, LIME was employed to explain the prediction outcome of a Decision Tree classifier for a single sample in a postoperative delirium dataset. Utilizing machine learning algorithms, the study identified preoperative blood glucose levels, forced expiratory volume (VC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and preoperative albumin levels as the four most critical factors influencing delirium. The GNB algorithm exhibited an accuracy of 89.8% within the real-world dataset cohort. In terms of precision, Gaussian Naive Bayes (gnb) ranked first. For recall and F1 score, gnb also performed the best, with a recall rate of 0.263 and an F1 score of 0.256. LinearSVC achieved the highest AUC value of 0.763, followed by Logistic Regression (0.754), MLPC (0.752), and gnb (0.727) in terms of area under the curve. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of using synthetic data for training AI models in predicting postoperative delirium. The findings suggest that GNB could be a preferred algorithm for predicting postoperative delirium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.