Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41611710›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A comprehensive IMU dataset for evaluating sensor layouts in human activity and intensity recognition.

Mingfei Feng, Qiwei Zhang, Hongbin Fang

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingfei FengCollege of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Qiwei ZhangCollege of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Hongbin FangCollege of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China. fanghongbin@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6691-0531

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 12532002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) with wearable sensors is widely applied in health monitoring, fitness tracking, and smart environments, but the choice of sensor configuration remains a critical factor for balancing recognition performance with usability and comfort. Existing datasets often lack the full-body coverage required to systematically evaluate sensor placement strategies. We present a comprehensive dataset of 12 daily activities performed by 30 participants, recorded using 17 inertial measurement units (IMUs) distributed across the entire body. Each IMU provides tri-axial acceleration and angular velocity signals at 60 Hz, aligned within a standardized global coordinate system. The dataset further includes detailed anthropometric metadata, structured annotations of activity and effort level, and processing scripts to support feature extraction, segmentation, and baseline model training. Benchmark experiments with both machine learning and deep learning models demonstrate the usability of the dataset across multiple temporal windows and sensor subsets. This resource enables systematic evaluation of sensor layout strategies and supports the development of practical, generalizable HAR systems.

Indexed as

Human ActivitiesWearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryDeep LearningHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID41611710
PMCPMC12957329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.