ArticleEBioMedicine2026
Spatial signature of low-frequency network changes accounts for pallidal stimulation outcome in cervical dystonia.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) has remarkable effects in patients with cervical dystonia. Yet, its neurophysiological mechanisms are not fully resolved to date. Converging evidence suggests that pallidal DBS modulates sensorimotor and cerebellar network activity in dystonia, possibly by disrupting pathologically enhanced low-frequency oscillations in the basal ganglia. Still, anatomical and electrophysiological findings have rarely been linked, and it is unclear whether oscillatory changes occur in the same network identified in neuroimaging studies.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we investigate the effects of pallidal DBS in patients with cervical dystonia using magnetoencephalography recordings on and off stimulation. We correlated DBS outcomes to the whole-cortex pattern of DBS-induced power changes in each cortical vertex.
findingsThis analysis revealed a distinct low-frequency electrophysiological signature that accounted for significant amounts of variance in DBS improvements across the cohort. The signature was characterised by negative peaks within the supplementary motor area and the motor cortex as well as positive peaks in prefrontal and cerebellar areas.
interpretationOur study sheds light on the cortical and cerebellar effects of pallidal DBS on a whole-cortex level and puts emphasis on low-frequency power modulation as a mechanism of effective stimulation beyond the basal ganglia in patients with cervical dystonia. Our findings might inform DBS programming and targeting as well as non-invasive stimulation strategies in the future.
fundingDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)-Project-ID 424778381-TRR 295.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.