Trial reportOccupational and environmental medicine2026
Effects of a peer coaching intervention for occupational physicians on time allocated to preventive tasks: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo support occupational physicians (OPs) in the execution of preventive tasks, a peer coaching intervention was developed and implemented in existing peer groups. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the intervention on OPs' execution of preventive tasks in practice.
methodsA total of 41 peer groups, including 231 OPs, participated in this cluster randomised controlled trial, of which 21 groups were assigned to the intervention group (N=106) and 20 to the control group (N=125). The intervention consisted of three peer coaching meetings aimed to promote the execution of preventive tasks. Data regarding the execution of preventive tasks, measured as percentage of their working time and hours allocated to specific preventive tasks, were collected at baseline, 6-month and 12-month follow-up. The effect of the intervention was examined by linear multilevel analysis.
resultsBoth the intervention and control group increased the percentage of working time allocated to prevention, from 14% at baseline to 17% at 12-month follow-up, but no significant differences between the study groups were found. For specific preventive tasks, the intervention group increased their time allocated to giving secondary prevention advice by 5 monthly hours compared with baseline.
conclusionsThe intervention was found not to have an effect on the percentage of working time allocated to prevention, possibly due to contextual factors. However, intervention effects were found for giving secondary preventive advice. Future studies should focus on the willingness of employers and occupational health and safety to invest in prevention and refinement of the intervention under study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15394765.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.