ReviewZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi2026
[Repair and reconstruction of facial organ injuries: a perfect fit of structure and function].
Review in Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peripheral facial palsy: contemporary advances and unresolved debates in management from pathogenic mechanisms to tailored reconstruction.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The repair of facial organ injuries is a complex field in plastic surgery that involves both functional recovery and morphological reconstruction. The therapeutic goal has evolved from traditional wound closure to the harmonious integration of form and function. To achieve this new objective, surgical plans need to combine various flap techniques, autologous and allogeneic tissue transplantation approaches, and incorporate emerging methods such as digital design and biomaterials. Although the repair outcomes of facial organ injuries have improved compared to the past, challenges remain, including insufficient nerve function reconstruction, limited scar management, donor site damage, and immune rejection in allogeneic transplantation. This article systematically reviews the mainstream repair methods and advancements in domestic and international research on key facial structures, including the nose, eyelids, lips, and ears, focusing on their defect characteristics and repair difficulties. It emphasizes how to achieve both three-dimensional structural reconstruction and dynamic functional restoration while maintaining aesthetic reconstruction. In the future, the integration of technologies such as tissue engineering, three-dimensional bioprinting, supermicrosurgery, and artificial intelligence will drive the development of facial organ injury repair and reconstruction towards precision, personalization, and minimally invasive approaches, ultimately achieving comprehensive rehabilitation of patients' physical, psychological, and social roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.