ArticleZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi2026
[Multidisciplinary expert consensus on tophus damage grading and surgical treatment (2025 edition)].
Article in Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Tophi, a severe complication of advanced gout, develop in approximately 12% to 53% of patients with gout. The treatment of bone and joint damages and chronic refractory wounds caused by tophi presents considerable clinical challenges. Currently, there is no unified standard for the optimal surgical timing, perioperative management, and treatment approaches for this condition. To address this, the Wound Repair Professional Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association convened a multidisciplinary panel of senior experts in wound repair, plastic surgery, orthopedics & joint surgery, rheumatology and immunology, radiology, and nursing and wound management. Based on the literature evidence combined with expert opinion, the panel employed nominal group and Delphi methods, and a grading standard (levels 1 to 4) defining the extent of tophi damage and the treatment principle were established for the first time to ensure homogeneity of surgical treatment; 14 recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of tophi were proposed, providing practical guidance for the surgical treatment of tophi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.