ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Deep learning-based lung volume estimation with dynamic chest radiography.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based lung volume estimation with dynamic chest radiography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a recently developed low-dose pulmonary functional imaging method that can be performed in a general X-ray room. DCR provides sequential images during respiration, and the measured changes in lung area are a promising diagnostic indicator of lung function. PURPOSE: To investigate lung volume estimation using deep learning from DCR images during respiration and evaluate its accuracy in comparison with previously proposed estimation methods.
methodsTwo convolutional neural networks (CNNs), VGG19 and DenseNet121, were trained using DCR image datasets from 257 patients, with reference lung volumes derived from corresponding computed tomography (CT) images. The performance of the models was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and compared against that of a conventional linear regression model. Correlation between the estimated and reference lung volumes was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and the degrees-of-freedom-adjusted coefficient of determination (Rf
resultsThe VGG19 and DenseNet121 models demonstrated superior performance in estimating whole lung volume (combined right and left lung) compared to the linear regression method. Specifically, MAE was 373/376 mL, MAPE was 8.1%/7.9%, r was 0.88/0.90, and Rf
conclusionThe proposed deep learning-based approach for lung volume estimation from DCR images outperformed the conventional linear regression method. Further improvements in CNN model architecture and the incorporation of guided forced respiratory maneuvers may enhance the potential for image-based pulmonary function testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.