Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41611233›Full record

ArticleClinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery2026

A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Patient Experiences, Unmet Needs and Desired Support in Those With Olfactory Dysfunction.

William Ansley, Gabija Klyvyte, Mehmet Ergisi, Natalia Glibbery, Lois Camp, Prajakta Choudari, Mohammed Jawad, Tharsika Myuran, Nikki Garner, Jane Vennik and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Norfolk Smell and Taste Clinic Experience-A Decade of Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

William AnsleyRhinology and Olfactology Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Gabija KlyvyteRhinology and Olfactology Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-4513-7489
Mehmet ErgisiRhinology and Olfactology Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2953-313X
Natalia GlibberyRhinology and Olfactology Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1050-5208
Lois CampRhinology and Olfactology Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Prajakta ChoudariRhinology and Olfactology Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Mohammed JawadRhinology and Olfactology Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Tharsika MyuranRhinology and Olfactology Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Nikki GarnerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.
Jane VennikPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4602-9805
Lorenzo StaffordDepartment of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Felix NaughtonSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Duncan BoakSmellTaste, Bicester, UK.
Carl PhilpottRhinology and Olfactology Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1125-3236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSmell and taste disorders (SATDs) are frequently overlooked despite growing prevalence. They profoundly impact quality of life. Effective therapies for SATDs remain scarce. This survey aimed to assess patient views surrounding the support available at the time of onset of SATDs, and what further support is needed. DESIGN AND

settingThis was a cross-sectional study consisting of an online survey circulated via the UK charity SmellTaste (known as Fifth Sense until a rebrand in May 2025), exploring features and impacts of SATDs, and opinions surrounding support available, and any further support felt to be necessary by those formally diagnosed or self-identifying with SATDs. MAIN OUTCOMES: Survey questions were grouped largely into the domains of demographics, features of olfactory issues, impact of disorder, and support network.

resultsA total of 410 participants completed the questionnaire, with the majority being women. When asked how olfactory dysfunction made participants feel, common responses included: 'sad', 'devastated', 'angry', 'anxious', 'depressed', 'isolated' and 'grief'. Family was reported as the greatest source of support when diagnosed with SATDs (partner/spouse, 36.4%; other family member, 15.1%) followed closely by SmellTaste (34%). Only 2.5% reported General Practitioners as their greatest source of support, with many participants reporting that primary care providers could not provide adequate help, leaving them to seek advice elsewhere (support groups, family, friends and self-investigation). Further support, covering medical, psychological and social interventions, was considered important.

conclusionGiven the complexity of issues experienced and the lack of formal support available for people with SATDs, there is a clear need for an intervention addressing unmet support needs.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandOlfaction DisordersQuality of LifeSocial SupportTaste DisordersAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomanosmiahyposmiaobservationalolfactory dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41611233
PMCPMC13050813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.