ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Characterizing phantom lymph node collection during curative-intent resection of non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPhantom lymph node collection, defined as intraoperative sampling of tissue presumed to be nodal that, on pathologic review, proves to be non-nodal, is a previously understudied outcome in thoracic surgery. This study aimed to quantify its incidence, identify associated factors, and assess its relationship with cancer-specific outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using a meticulously curated Veterans Health Administration dataset of patients undergoing curative-intent non-small cell lung cancer resection between 2018 and 2024. Our primary outcomes included frequency of phantom lymph node collection, along with covariates independently associated with it. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and recurrence-free survival.
resultsA total of 2972 veterans were included in this cohort. Phantom lymph node collection occurred in 327 (11.0%) patients. On multivariable analysis, phantom lymph node collection was more likely with lower-lobe tumors (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.88), and less likely among patients who received guideline-concordant nodal sampling (≥3 N2 and ≥1 N1 nodal stations) (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.74). Notably, phantom lymph node collection was not associated with overall (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.19) or recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68-1.08).
conclusionsPhantom lymph node collection is common during curative-intent resection of early-stage lung cancer. Although not prognostic, its association with guideline-concordant sampling highlights it as a potential target for surgical quality improvement initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.