SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2026
Fiber intake and laxation in people with normal bowel function: a systematic review.
Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptimal evidence-based dietary recommendations for dietary fiber have not been established.
objectivesThis study aims to conduct a systematic review of fiber and gut motility (laxation) in noninfants with normal bowel function.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL from inception through 4 March, 2025, and existing systematic review reference lists. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the general population without bowel dysfunction that compared fiber amounts or types and assessed stool consistency, fecal weight, fecal frequency, or gut transit time. We categorized fibers according to their solubility, viscosity, and fermentability and performed hierarchical Bayesian regression models and spline analyses across reported total and added fiber intake doses, with subanalyses by fiber type. We assessed study risk of bias and strength of evidence (SoE).
resultsWe identified 113 eligible trials, with low or moderate risk of bias. Models provided moderate SoE that increasing fiber intake (per g/d total fiber) yields softening stool consistency [0.013 units, 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.009, 0.016 on the Bristol Stool Scale], increasing total fecal weight (1.76 g/d, 95% CrI: 1.58, 1.94) and dry fecal weight (0.47 g/d, 95% CrI: 0.42, 0.51), increasing fecal frequency (0.053 additional bowel movements/wk, 95% CrI: 0.042, 0.065), and shortening gut transit times (-0.24 h, 95% CrI: -0.36, -0.12). Associations between fiber intake and outcomes varied across fiber doses and type. Low-solubility and low-fermentability fibers had the strongest associations with laxation outcomes, with low to medium SoE. However, findings are indirect, based on models, and there is insufficient evidence in specific subpopulations.
conclusionsRCTs support small to modest effects of dietary fiber on laxation in generally healthy people with normal bowel function. Low-solubility and low-fermentability fibers yielded the strongest effects. Future studies should better characterize fiber properties, assess wider ranges of fiber doses, and comprehensively report participants' total and background fiber intake. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42024522380.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.