ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2026
Predicted effects of hip distraction on knee ligament mechanics following total knee arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHip distraction is essential for hip arthroscopy and other orthopaedic surgeries, but high traction forces often lead to complications like nerve injury and soft tissue impairment. Patients with total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) may face increased risk due to altered joint mechanics; however, the impact of specific TKA configurations on knee behavior during distraction is poorly understood.
methodsA validated finite element model of the pelvis and lower extremity was developed from patient CT and MRI data. Three configurations were modeled: bi-cruciate retaining (BCR), posterior-cruciate retaining (PCR; lacking ACL), and posterior-stabilized (PS; lacking both cruciates). Hip distraction was simulated with axial traction forces (100-500 N) applied to the distal tibia/fibula with the pelvis fixed proximally. Knee and hip joint displacement and ligament strains were evaluated.
findingsThe BCR model demonstrated the highest knee stiffness. ACL removal (PCR) reduced stiffness more compared to PCL removal. While the amount of hip distraction was consistent across models, PCR and PS knees experienced excessive knee distraction (>12 mm) and ligament strains exceeding 20% before achieving 10 mm of hip distraction. Conversely, the BCR model remained under 10 mm of knee distraction and 15% strain at equivalent hip distraction levels.
interpretationFinite element analysis revealed that PCR and PS configurations exhibit knee instability, exceeding soft tissue injury thresholds (>20% strain) within standard clinical traction ranges (250-350 N). The ACL contributed greater to knee complex stiffness in axial traction compared to the PCL. Standard traction forces may pose an iatrogenic risk to PCR and PS patients, suggesting a need for TKA-specific distraction protocols to prevent soft tissue failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.