ArticleAddictive behaviors2026
Passive data do not improve prediction or detection of alcohol consumption beyond temporal patterns in major depression: A 90-day cross-validated study.
Article in Addictive behaviors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent psychological disorders and frequently co-occurs with alcohol use disorders, increasing the risk of functional impairment. Monitoring alcohol use during depression treatment is therefore critical for early intervention. Passively collected data via devices like smartphones and smartwatches, offers a low-burden method for monitoring behavior in real time. This study investigated whether deep learning models trained on passively collected data (i.e., accelerometer, heart rate, respiratory rate, screen usage, and GPS data) could detect and predict alcohol use in individuals with MDD. Data were collected from 300 clinically depressed individuals who were enrolled in the Tracking Depression Study, a 90-day longitudinal study. Participants self-reported their alcohol use every week by completing the Timeline FollowBack. We trained models to predict same-day and next-day alcohol use. To validate these models, we split the data by participant, so that predictions were made on individuals who were not included in the training set. The models achieved moderate performance (mean AUC = 0.67 for both prediction tasks) when capturing both interindividual (between-person) and intraindividual (within-person) variability. Similar performances were observed when evaluating the model exclusively on predicting intraindividual variability (AUCs = 0.69 same-day, 0.68 next-day). However, model performance remained comparable to a baseline using only the day of week as predictor. These findings suggest that much of the predictive signal derives from temporal patterns. This indicates that interventions aligned with such temporal cues may already be effective, and that the added value of our model appears limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.